Start with at least one day 9-16
There is more material than that, make plans on how to cover the rest either as a day 2 or as several more smaller sessions
The purpose of the “connect” session is
We want this to start right away in the morning to avoid people settling into “listening mode”. Thus: Keep your welcomes etc very short (< 1 minute!) and get started with some connect activities almost immediately. Pairwise activities are best since then everyone needs to participate
Hi, welcome to this day with our team! We have prepared a lot of interesting exercises and I hope you all will find this both useful and fun for our team! Before we get into the agenda etc in a few minute, I would like us all to get started with some warm-up activities.
Could you all pair up with someone and discuss for a minute: *
Is there a difference between a team and any group of people What is it?
Let them talk for 5 minutes for so until they get going, then interrupt them and collect some ideas from the pairs. Then give then another warm-up question
Before we start on trying to build a really great team, we should agree on what that is. How would anyone be able to see that we successfully have created a really great team?
Let them talk for 5 minutes and then collect some answers. It will be a mix on actions to take how to achieve greatness and how to actually see that greatness have been achieved.
Never mind! Show the the definition from Richard Hackman and ask them to compare with their own discussions:
Ok, what we will work on today is designed to help us achieve this. Let’s look at the agenda:
Time required, 5-15 min See separate facilitation guide
The Journey Lines exercise is a really good way to address this and other goals for new and old teams. Time required is about 2h, depending on team size.
For a team that has been working together, Appreciation Cards is another really nice way to start a session focused on team development. Time required is < 30 min.
Use both exercises, but perhaps not in the same session!
Time required, typically: 30 min - 2h
See separate facilitation guide
Time required, typically: 30 min - 1h
See separate facilitation guide
Time required, typically 1h
See separate facilitation guide
Facilitate making a few team agreements on how to work together. Start with some individual reflections and then use “fist of five” to quickly refine some proposals and make consent decision. Document on a flipchart.
One working agreement that you probably want to explore with your team is how and when to work as individuals and how and when to work as a team. Check out the guide on ‘Balancing Team- and Individual work’ for a good way to do that.
Time required, typically 1,5h
See separate facilitation guide
A similar but slightly simpler exercise is “Market of Skills” Time required: 30-60 min See separate facilitation guide:
Team formation theory
A team move through different phases. See for example the forming, storming, norming, performing theory by Bruce Tuckman or the more recent work by Susan Wheelan. Quickly show the team this and help them realize that this will happen.Especially that the first honeymoon period will be followed by a period of conflict and that this is a good thing that will enable the team to grow if navigated properly.
Repair broken agreement
Time required, typically 30 min
Making decisions
In this guide your team can practise consent decision making using “fist of five” in the beginning of the day and during working agreements section.
You may want to mention that for “way of working” decisions, consent decision making is often required - i.e. all team members have to agree to follow the agreement. If not you will get low buy in. In other situations other decision making methods are better suited. E.g. majority vote, individuals decide, at least two members agree etc. The team should strive to define how decisions are made before they try to decide something.
Problem solving
Teams need to learn systematic problem solving to enable good decision making. This is needed both to solve technical problems in a better way than basing it on opinions. It is also needed to solve many way of working problems in larger organizations.The A3 method and/or cause effect diagrams is one good technique that often is valuable for both these problems. This is best practised on some real problems in a separate session. Set aside 2 hours for that and invite a set of stakeholders that can contribute a diverse set of views on some difficult problem.